The interview

I did last night was really interesting. He is a sociologist and research on book review and the development of the literary taste does. We languages on the phone for an hour. As a person who never does anything speak much, I was then tuckered out. But the time flew by.

Varied the kind of things that you me asked were, how I decide what book I read next? My answer was long and hiking, and basically came down to my mood and I apologize for be so imprecise depended.Asked about the last novel, I checked that I liked (the master) and what was it pleased me darüber.Sie asked about the last book I checked that I disliked and I not one could think of!

We talked about, whether to know biographical information about the author in writing a review important said war.Ich sometimes and then asked me, explain the difference between if it was and was not useful and how to decide. You also asked why I started blogging (I wanted to talk other books with selfish reasons to find), who I my me audience (since I am always surprised, I have any kind of audience I am egocentric and imagine as the reader) presented and whether I ever tired review or discuss books got (no, if I did I would stop blogging).

The conversation touched also publishers and marketing and the decline of book reviewing in the print media and why I that thought (I could say that I don't think the large conglomerates, the print media outlets books and literature owned).We talked about the differences between print-and online review and.

There are some things that I'm missing, but this was the best daraus.Sie goes to a journal article, and a monograph publish their research findings it was funny and kind of stress and all rather surreal.

This entry permalink. was posted in books, personal, reading, Bewertungen.Lesezeichen ← weekend school and reading NotesYou are not a gadget →12 responses to the interview

View the Original article